The Indoor Aerial Permitting Record

Methodology

Defer to the authority, always

Every regulatory statement in this record is attributed and linked to the authority's own published material — a fire code section, an AHJ guidance document, a venue-authority requirement. Nothing is stated in Sitara's own voice, and nothing is summarized in a way that could be mistaken for the authority's own words without the citation attached.

Explicit vs. analogous, always labeled

Only one entry in this record — the Los Angeles Fire Department Film Unit's Drone (Unmanned Aerial Systems) Permit — explicitly names drones/UAS as its own permit category. Every other entry (Las Vegas Fire & Rescue, Clark County Fire Department, LA County Fire) is a pyrotechnics or special-effects permit category that would likely be the authority's functional entry point for indoor aerial FX, but none of those documents mention drones or UAS anywhere. The record labels each entry "explicit" or "analogous" and never blurs the two.

No jurisdiction without a real source

If a jurisdiction's picture can't be sourced from a published authority document, it doesn't get an entry — no "typically" rows. This is why the record currently covers only the FAA's universal layer plus three jurisdictions: Clark County/Las Vegas and Los Angeles city and county. Additional jurisdictions are added only once properly sourced.

Known sourcing caveats

Refresh

Reviewed quarterly: links re-verified, new jurisdictions added only once properly sourced, the last-updated stamp bumped.